The Witness of Carolyn
Graham
This witness was sent to me by letter in
October of 1995. I typed it exactly as written into my computer
as follows.
October 16, 1995
Dear Rob,
Here's that testimony I promised you. Its not very
polished, but is as I recall from 1956--nearly forty years ago.
In the church where I grew up in the thirties and
forties, the theology was gloomy and pessimistic, Calvinism at
its worst.
We were taught to read the Bible literally, especially the
parts describing a wrathful Creator wreaking cataclysmic
vengeance upon a terrified creation. Of course, our preacher did
teach that Christ died for the sins of the world, but there was a
catch: only a few out of all the human beings ever born were
actually destined for salvation, and to add to the desperate-
ness of the human plight, we could not even choose salvation.
The soul's destiny was decided upon before birth, and that was
that. A few, the "remnant," had been destined for heaven; the
majority, however, were headed for hell.
I grew up figuring I was one of that latter group. Of course
I went through the ritual of answering altar call, getting
"saved," and being baptized, just on the off chance that I was
one of the elect, but secretly I figured that the odds were
against me.
Nevertheless, for a while I worked at having faith; finally
I gave up and tried to forget about God. That worked, more or
less, for five or six years, but soon after my second child was
born the whole thing came crashing down on me. I became very
anxious and depressed, absolutely haunted by a sense of doom.
I knew I was damned. All the theology I had ever been taught
pointed in that direction. Further, I knew that passage in
Hebrews that says that if you sin after being saved, there's no
further possibility of salvation. I had sinned plenty. So the
sense of damnation was a horror that I lived with day and night.
I wished I could be obliterated from existence, not dead, for
that meant hell, but simply erased, never to have been. I envied
the innocent animals who could never know damnation. This state
of mind was one long torment that went on and on, week after
week. To add to my misery, I couldn't sleep. I was convinced
that if I went to sleep I'd die, and of course go instantly to
hell. So 2:00 AM often found me frenetically cleaning house, wide
awake, exhausted, and pretty close to crazy. No one, of course,
knew about this, not my husband, not anybody. There was no one to
talk with.
Finally late one night during one of these insomniac bouts,
I came to the breaking point. I couldn't bear my life as it was
any more. I had to have help. The Lord had to speak to me. I
had to pray. So I brought my Bible into the kitchen with me and
sat down at the table. Then I prayed the most audacious prayer
of my life: "Lord, I've got to know. I'm going to open this Bible
and look. Whatever I see, that'll be your word to me. heaven
or hell--let me know." Then, literally in fear and trembling,
I opened the Bible and looked. I looked and put my head down on
the table, dizzy with relief. The words I saw spake to me with
the absolute authority of a divine voice. Those words were:
"Fear not" I had turned to the 54th chapter of Isaiah, and my
eye had fallen on the fourth verse.
I pulled myself together and read further:
Fear not; for thou shalt not be ashamed: neither be thou confounded; for thou shalt not be put to to shame: for thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth. . . . For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great mercies will I gather thee. In a little wrath I hid my face from thee for moment; but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on thee, saith the Lord thy Redeemer. . . . For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the cove- nant of my peace be removed, saith the Lord that hath mercy on thee.Those words had the effect, as you so accurately put it, of a great wind blowing away all that dead theology that had been torturing me. In that moment, I turned around. I may still have been sick with post partum blues--I don't remember--but I never gave hell another thought. I knew it was not for me. I knew that God, in his exquisite kindness, had seen my tor- ment and my tenor and pitied me, had enfolded me in love and comforted me.
Comment
In another essay, I describe how God's triune nature implies
miracle. link That Carolyn
was affected profoundly by what she read, that it seemed to be
God's voice, that her eye fell upon just the right verse, can all
be seen as relatively normal events within the causal nexus of
the world. Simply put, it was the product of chance and
desperation.
But that is not the case from Carolyn's point of view. From
her point of view, she was addressed by a transcendent God. "The
words I saw spake to me with the absolute authority of a divine
voice." This God held her destiny in his hands and was perfectly
capable of sending her to hell. This God had effects on her. As
she put it, "I never gave hell another thought. I knew it was not
for me. I knew that God, in his exquisite kindness, had seen my
torment and my tenor and pitied me, had enfolded me in love and
comforted me."
A dispassionate third party observer could ascribe these
effects to natural causes, but that is not possible for Carolyn.
Natural effects do not determine one's eternal destiny. She
would consider it foolish to think that the Being which spoke to
her was an effect of the created order. In other words, she was
miraculously addressed from beyond. It was a miracle as in Jesus
being raised from the dead.
Nor, from the point of view of faith, could she adopt the
two-language theory and claim that the event can be seen as a
result of natural causes which she then interprets as the voice
of God. She did not interpret a natural sequence of events as a
divine voice. Initially, there was no interpretation here. She
was addressed by a divine voice and that voice changed her life.
Interpretation implies distance, standing back and abstracting
from a given reality. One does not hear a voice when one
interprets, but interprets what was seen and heard after the
voice has spoken. To say that the "divine voice" was the result
of interpretation is to say that she decides the source of the
words she heard, rather than recognizing that the Voice decided
to address her.
Of course, a decision is involved. But classical theology
has always seen two factors, the Word and the subjective
appropriation of the Word which is Spirit. The Spirit does not
determine the Word as Word, but recognizes the priority of the
Word already given as Word. Theologically, if Carolyn were to
claim that she decides when the Word is the Divine Word, that is
tantamount to placing her own word of decision above the
Word which was received. And that, in a nutshell, is the whole
of modernist theology, an attempt to step back from God and
decide for the autonomy of the self over against God. That is
the one thing that faith cannot do.
The Rev. Robert J. Sanders, Ph.D.
robertsanders@iglide.net
home